1. Darwinist will call an ID proponent a "creationist," meaning they are Bible thumpers that can be dismissed out of hand. After all, the Bible is not science, so an ID person must be an anti-science person. False. First of all the Bible does not say that the earth was created in six literal days. Those who believe in a literal interpretation of this are plainly mistaken. The Bible says that one day is like a thousand days, for instance. See 2 Peter 3:8 which states: "With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day." I've read over 30 books by ID proponents. Not one has ever stated that he/she believes in creationism. There are Christians who believe in creationism, meaning the the earth was created in six literal days, but I've never heard of one ID proponent claiming to be a creationist. I'm not a creationist. I believe that God created the universe but I also believe that science has shown the universe to be about 13.7 billion years old and the earth about 4.5 billions years old. Even if you are a "creationist" how does that negate the evidence of ID? If you brain surgeon is a creationist will this disqualify him from doing brain surgery? When you disagree you must present evidence to nullify the other's evidence, not ad hominem attacks.
2. When Darwinist call an ID proponent a "creationist," they falsely assume this. They believe that since you're not a Darwinist you must be a "creationist. Again, this is a false charge not based on any knowledge of the accused person.
The Darwinist handle any opposition with ad hominem attacks; they try to slime you. They do not present opposing evidence, they just call you names such as "creationist," anti-science and other hateful epithets. A few years ago I attended a debate at Biola University in La Mirada, California where a Christian debated an atheist, William Lane Craig was the Christian and Peter Singer of Princeton University, the atheist. Darwinist will never allow an ID person to step foot in a college campus.
If you're a science teacher, try mentioning any evidence against the Darwinian theory and see what happens. You will be escorted out of the school and fired on the spot. Is this academic freedom? This is pure academic tyranny. A few years ago a movie was released dealing with this issue and details what happened to scientists who dared say anything other than tow the Darwinian line. Watch a trailer of this film here.
2. When Darwinist call an ID proponent a "creationist," they falsely assume this. They believe that since you're not a Darwinist you must be a "creationist. Again, this is a false charge not based on any knowledge of the accused person.
The Darwinist handle any opposition with ad hominem attacks; they try to slime you. They do not present opposing evidence, they just call you names such as "creationist," anti-science and other hateful epithets. A few years ago I attended a debate at Biola University in La Mirada, California where a Christian debated an atheist, William Lane Craig was the Christian and Peter Singer of Princeton University, the atheist. Darwinist will never allow an ID person to step foot in a college campus.
If you're a science teacher, try mentioning any evidence against the Darwinian theory and see what happens. You will be escorted out of the school and fired on the spot. Is this academic freedom? This is pure academic tyranny. A few years ago a movie was released dealing with this issue and details what happened to scientists who dared say anything other than tow the Darwinian line. Watch a trailer of this film here.
No comments:
Post a Comment